Comprehensive Index
of the Sectoral Bibliographies
Abaza, Hussein, Ron Bisset and Barry
Sadler. 2004. Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic
Environmental Assessment: Towards an Integrated Approach.
Geneva: UNEP-ETB,
148 p.
Abaza,
Hussein and Andrea Baranzini, editors. 2002. Implementing Sustainable
Development: Integrated Assessment and Participatory
Decision-Making Processes. Geneva and Cheltenham UK &
Northampton MA: UNEP-ETB and Edward Elgar Publishing, 304 p.
Abbott, Kenneth W., Robert O. Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik, Anne-Marie
Slaughter, and Duncan Snidal. 2001. The Concept of Legalization. In
Legalization and World Politics,
edited by Judith L. Goldstein, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane,
and Anne-Marie Slaughter, 17-36. Cambridge, MA: IO Foundation
and MIT Press.
Abbott, Kenneth W. and Duncan Snidal. 2001. Hard Law and Soft Law in
International Governance. In Legalization and World Politics,
edited by Judith L. Goldstein, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, and
Anne-Marie Slaughter, 37-73. Cambridge, MA: IO Foundation and
MIT Press.
Abdel Motaal, Doaa. 2007. The Trade and
Environment Policy Formulation Process. In
Trade and Environment -- A
Resource Book,
edited by Adil
Najam, Mark Halle and
Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz, 17-25. Geneva, Winnipeg, London: ICTSD, IISD,
Ring Alliance, 253 p. (available on the three Web sites).
Abdel Motaal, Doaa. 2005. Is the World Trade Organization
Anti-Precaution? Journal of World Trade 39 (3): 483-502.
Abdel Motaal, Doaa. 2004. The “Multilateral Scientific Consensus”
and the World Trade Organization. Journal of World Trade 38
(5): 855-876.
Abdel Motaal, Doaa. 2002. The Observership of Intergovernmental
Organizations in the WTO, Post-Doha: Is there Political Will to
Bridge the Divide? Journal of World Intellectual Property
5 (3): 477-490.
Abdel Motaal, Doaa. 1999. The TBT Agreement, the CTE, and
Ecolabeling. In Trade,
Environment, and the Millennium,
edited by
Gary P. Sampson and W. Bradnee Chambers, 223-239. Tokyo: UN
University Press.
Abramovitz, Janet N. 1998. Putting a
Value on Nature's "Free Services." World*Watch Magazine
11 (1): 10-20.
‘Academics’ Amicus curiae
Report.’ 2004. See Busch, Lawrence, Robin Grove-White, Sheila
Jasanoff, David Winickoff and Brian Wynne.
Ackermann,
Frank. 2008. Poisoned for Pennies - The Economics of Toxics and
Precaution. Washington and London: Island Press, 318 p.
ActionAid
International. 2005. Bound and Tied - The Developmental Impacts
of Industrial Trade Liberalization Negotiations at the WTO.
London, 35 p.
http://www.actionaid.org/docs/bound_tied.pdf
Aguilar, Soledead, Karen Alvarenga, Pia M. Kohler, Kati Kulovesi
and Elsa Tsioumani. 2006. Third Meeting of the Parties to the
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. IISD-Environmental
Negotiations Bulletin 9 (351): 1-12. http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb09351e.pdf
Al-Ajmi,
Thaqal S. 2007. Maritime Transport of Environmentally Damaging
Materials: A Balance Between Absolute Freedom and Strict
Prohibition. Law Environment and Development Journal LEAD 3 (1):
38-55.
http://www.lead-journal.org/content/07040.pdf
Alam, Shawkat. 2007. Trade Restrictions
Pursuant to Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Developmental
Implications for Developing Countries. Journal of World Trade
41 (5): 983-1015.
Alikhan, Shahid. 2000.
Socio-Economic Benefits of Intellectual Property Protection in
Developing Countries. Geneva: WIPO, 199 p.
Allbeury, Kerry et Ève
Truilhé. 2002. La preuve dans le règlement des différends à l'OMC -
Applications possibles en matière d'OGM?
In
Le commerce international des organismes génétiquement modifiés,
edited by Jacques Bourrinet et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 285-305.
Paris : CERIC et La documentation française.
Anderson, Alun. 2002. In den Proteinen ist die Wahrheit.
Das TA Magazin 49: 58-59.
Andersen, Regine. 2002. The Time Dimension in International [IPR]
Regime Interplay. Global Environmental Politics 2 (3):
98-118.
Appleton, Arthur E. 2000. The Labeling of GMO Products Pursuant to
International Trade Rules. New York University Environmental Law
Journal
8 (3): 1-13.
http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/envtllaw/issues/vol8/3/v8n3a4.pdf
Appleton, Arthur E. 1999. Environmental Labelling Schemes: WTO Law
and Developing Country Implications. In Trade, Environment and
the Millennium, edited by Gary P. Sampson and W. Bradnee
Chambers, 195-223.
Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University.
Appleton, Arthur E. 1999. Shrimp/Turtle: Untangling the Nets.
Journal of International Economic Law, 477-496.
Araya, Monica. 2000, Lessons from the Stalemate in Seattle.
Journal of Environment and Development 9 (2): 183-190.
Ayres, Ed. 2004. The Hidden Shame of
the Global Industrial Economy. World*Watch Magazine 17 (1):
20-30.
Bäckstrand,
Karin. 2003. Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of
the Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance.
Global Environmental Politics 3 (4): 24-42.
Bagader, Abubakr Ahmed et al. 1994. Environmental Protection in
Islam - La protection de l'environnement en Islam. Second Revised
Edition. IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 20 Rev. IUCN,
Gland and Cambridge, UK, and Meteorology and Environmental
Protection Administration (MEPA) of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,
Djedda, 85 p.
Bail, Christoph, Robert Falkner and Helen Marquard, eds. 2002.
The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in
Biotechnology with Environment and Development? London:
Earthscan/RIIA, 579 p.
Baker,
Peter. 2008. US Sees Much to Fear in a Hostile Russia. New York
Times,
22 August,
p. A1. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/22/world/europe/22policy.html?th&emc=th
Barnes Tonya, Stas Burgiel and Katell Le Goulven. 2000. Fourth
Intersessional Meeting of the IUCG-4 in Neuchâtel, Switzerland,
12-17 November, Environmental Negotiations Bulletin 9 (167)
20.11.2000,
http://www.iisd.ca/
Barrios, Paula. 2004. The
Rotterdam Convention on Hazardous Chemicals: A Meaningful Step
Toward Environmental Protection?
Georgetown International Environmental Law Review,
Summer issue (online
version).
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3970/is_200407/ai_n9429400
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3970/is_200407/ai_n9429400/pg_3
Barton, John H. 2007. New
Trends in Technology Transfer. Geneva: ICTSD Issue Paper No. 18,
41 p.
Baumüller, Heike. 2005. Trade in Biotechnology: Development
and the Clash of Collective Preferences. In Trading in Genes
- Development Perspectives on Biotechnology, Trade and
Sustainability, edited by Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz
and Vicente Sánchez, 57-77. London: Earthscan.
Baumüller, Heike. 2003.
Domestic Import Regulations for Genetically Modified Organisms
and their Compatibility with WTO Rules - Some Key Issues
(IISD-ICTSD Trade Knowledge Network),
http://www.tradeknowledgenetwork.net/publication.aspx?id=587.
Baumüller,
Heike and Geoff Tansey. 2008. Responding to Change. In The Future
Control of Food, edited by Geoff Tansey and Tasmin Rajotte,
171-197. Ottawa and London: Earthscan, IDRC and QUIAP.
Bellmann, Christophe, Graham Dutfield and Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz.
2003.
Trading in Knowledge: Development Perspectives on TRIPS, Trade
and Sustainability. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan
Publications/ICTSD, 359 p.
Bereano,
Phil and Martin Phillipson. 2004.
Goliath vs.
Schmeiser.
Gene
Watch
17
(4).
http://www.gene-watch.org/genewatch/articles/17-4Bereano.html
Bereano, Phil and Eliott Peacock. 2004. To Eat … or Not to Eat? An
Obscure UN Agency Tries to Provide an Answer. Seedling,
April, 12-17.
http://www.grain.org/seedling/?id=282
Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Nathalie,
Daniel Magraw, Maria Julia Oliva, Marcos Orellana and Elisabeth
Tuerk. 2005. Environment and Trade: A Guide to WTO Jurisprudence.
London: Earthscan, 371 p.
Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Nathalie. 2001. The Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety: A Multilateral Approach to Regulate GMOs. In
Reconciling Environment and Trade, edited by Edith Brown Weiss
and John H. Jackson, 689-723. New York: Transnational Publishers.
Bernauer, Thomas. 2003. Genes,
Trade, and Regulation - the Seeds of Conflict in Food Biotechnology.
Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 230 p.
Bertrand, Agnès. 2001. Big Brother en tous ces Etats – le rôle de
l’Organe dévaluation des politiques comerciales (OEPC/TPRM).
L’Écologiste 2 (1): 52-56.
Betsill, Michele M. and Elisabeth Corell. 2001. NGO Influence in
International Environmental Negotiations: A Framework of Analysis.
Global Environmental Politics 1 (4): 65-86.
Bhatti, Shakeel T. 2004. Intellectual
Property and Traditional Knowledge: the Work and Role of WIPO. In
Protecting and Promoting
Traditional Knowledge: Systems, National Experiences and
International Dimensions, edited
by Sophia Twarog and Promilia Kapoor,121-131. Geneva: UNCTAD.
Biber-Klemm, Susette. 2004. Protection
of TK on Biological Diversity: Reflections in Connection with World
Trade. In Protecting and
Promoting Traditional Knowledge: Systems, National Experiences and
International Dimensions, edited
by Sophia Twarog and Promilia Kapoor, 95-107. Geneva: UNCTAD.
Biermann, Frank and Steffen Bauer, eds. 2005. A world
environmental organization: Solution or threat for effective
international environmental governance. Aldershot, Hampshire,
England: Ashgate.
Biermann,
Frank and Klaus Dingwerth, guest editors, 2004. Special Issue on
Global Environmental Change and the Nation State. Global
Environmental Politics 4 (1): 1-115.
Biermann, Frank. 2001, The Emerging Debate on the Need for a World
Environment Organization: A Commentary. Global Environmental
Politics
1 (1): 45-56.
Bilal Sanoussi and Pavlos Pezaros,
editors. 2000. Negotiating the Future of Agricultural Policies:
Agricultural Trade and the Millennium WTO Round. The Hague: Kluwer
Law, 311 p.
Biswas, Treenesh. 2007. A Trade and Environment Timeline.
In
Trade and Environment -- A
Resource Book,
edited by Adil
Najam, Mark Halle and
Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz, 215-220. Geneva, Winnipeg, London: ICTSD,
IISD, Ring Alliance, 253 p. (available on the three Web sites).
Boardman, Robert. 1981.
International Organizations and the Conservation of Nature,
London, The Macmillan Press Ltd., 215 p.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. 2006.
Normes, standards et règles en droit international. In Les enjeux
de la normalisation technique internationale – Entre environnement,
santé et commerce international, sous la direction d’ Estelle
Brosset et Ève Truilhé-Marengo, 43-56. Aix-en-Provence et
Paris : CERIC et La documentation française.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. 2005.
The Global Environment Facility (GEF): A Unique and Crucial
Institution. RECIEL 14(3): 193-202.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. 2003.
Le rôle des organes de règlement des différends de l'OMC dans le
développement du droit international de l'environnement: entre le
marteau et l'enclume.
In Droit de l'Organisation Mondiale du Commerce et protection
de l'environnement, sous la direction de Sandrine Maljean-Dubois,
379-400.
Aix-en-Provence et Bruxelles: CERIC et Bruylant.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. 2003. The GEF as a Pioneering
Institution: Lessons Learned and Looking Ahead. Working Paper
No. 19, October. Washington DC: Global Environment Facility.
http://www.gefweb.org/Outreach/outreach-PUblications/2003-11WP19.pdf
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. 2003. The Use of Unilateral Trade
Measures to Protect the Environment. In Economic Globalization
and Compliance with International Environmental Agreements,
edited by A. Kiss, D. Shelton and K. Ishibashi, 181-192. The Hague:
Kluwer.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. 2003. Conclusions. In
La sécurité alimentaire dans l’Union européenne, sous la
direction de Jacques Bourrinet et Francis Snyder, 177-184.
Bruxelles: Bruylant.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. 2002. Le principe de précaution:
Nature, contenu et limites. In Le principe de précaution: Aspects
de droit international et communautaire, sous la direction de
Charles Leben et Joe Verhoeven, 65-94. Paris : Editions Panthéon
Assas.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. 2002. Mondialisation et règlement
des différends: défis et réponses. International Law Forum du
Droit International 4 (1): 26-31.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. 2002. A propos de la régulation
juridique de stratégies économiques dans le domaine de
l'environnement. In L'outil économique en droit international et
européen de l'environnement, sous la direction de Sandrine
Maljean-Dubois, 227-243. Paris : CERIC et La documentation française.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. 1999. The Global Environment
Facility Galaxy: On Linkages among Institutions. In Max Planck
Yearbook of United Nations Law 3: 243-286.
Boisson de
Chazournes, Laurence and Makane Moïse Mbengue.
2008. Trade, Environment and
Biotechnology: on Coexistence and Coherence. In Genetic
Engineering and the World Trade System -- World Trade Forum,
edited by
Daniel Wüger and Thomas Cottier,
205-245. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Boisson
de Chazournes, Laurence and Makane Moïse Mbengue. 2007. A Propos
du principe du soutien mutuel -- les relations entre le Protocole de
Cartagena et les accords de l'OMC. Revue Générale du Droit
International Public. Numéro 4: 829-863.
Boisson
de Chazournes, Laurence and Makane Moïse Mbengue. 2006.
International Legal Aspects of the Co-Existence between GM and
non-GM products: Approaches under International Environmental
Law and International Law. Montpellier: GMCC Proceedings, 15-29.
Boisson de Chazournes,
Laurence and Urs P. Thomas, Editors. 2006. WTO Law, Science and Risk
Communication.
EcoLomic Policy
and Law, Vol.
3 Special
Edition, 115 p.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence,
Richard Desgagné, Makane Moïse Mbengue and Cesare Romano. 2005.
Protection Internationale de l’environnement, Nouvelle édition
revue et augmentée. Paris: Editions A. Pedone, 808 p.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence and Makane Moïse Mbengue. 2004. GMOs
and Trade: Issues at Stake in the EC-Biotech Dispute. Review of
European Community & International Environmental Law (RECIEL) 13
(3): 289-305.
Boisson de
Chazournes, Laurence and Makane Moïse Mbengue. 2003. The amici
curiae and the Dispute Settlement System: The Doors are Open.
The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 2:
205-248.
Boisson de Chazournes,
Laurence et Makane Moïse Mbengue.
2003. L’amicus
curiae devant l’Organe de règlement des différends de l’OMC.
In Droit de l'Organisation Mondiale du Commerce et protection
de l'environnement, sous la direction de Sandrine Maljean-Dubois,
400-443.
Aix-en-Provence et Bruxelles: CERIC et Bruylant.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, et Makane Moïse Mbengue. 2002. La
Déclaration de Doha de la Conférence ministérielle de l’OMC et sa
portée dans les relations commerce/environnement. Revue Générale du Droit International Public 106 (4): 855-893.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence et Makane Moïse Mbengue. 2002. Le
rôle des organes de règlement des différends de l'OMC dans le
développement du droit: à propos des OGM. In Le commerce
international des organismes génétiquement modifiés, edited by
Jacques Bourrinet et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 177-213. Paris : CERIC
et La documentation française.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence and Urs P. Thomas, Editors. 2000. The
Biosafety Protocol: Regulatory Innovation and Emerging Trends.
Swiss Review of International and European Law 10 (4): 513-559.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/biosa_lbc_upt_etal_bp_regulatory_innov_emerging_trends_
rsdie_00_4.pdf
Bond,
Patrick. 2003. South Africa’s Subimperial Agenda: Splitting Africa
to Launch a New Trade Round. Focus on Trade 90 August, 8-13.
http://www.focusweb.org/publications/FOT%20pdf/fot90.pdf
Bonny, Sylvie. 2003. Why are Most Europeans Opposed to GMOs?
Factors Explaining Rejection of France and Europe. Electronic
Journal of Biotechnology 6 (1), April 15.
http://www.ejbiotechnology.info/content/vol6/issue1/full/4/
Bordogna
Petriccione, Barbara. 2004. Introduction to GMOs: Techniques and
Safety. Les cahiers du RIBios 1, 74 p.
Bossis, G.
2001. Les OGM, entre liberté des échanges et précaution. Revue
européenne de droit de l'environnement 3: 255-273.
Bourg,
Dominique et Jean-Louis Schlegel. 2001.
Parer aux risques de demain : le principe de précaution.
Paris : Éditions du Seuil, 185 p.
Bourrinet, Jacques et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, éd. 2002.
Le commerce international des organismes génétiquement modifiés.
Aix-Marseille/Paris: CERIC/La documentations française,
384 p.
Brack, Duncan. 1999. Environmental
Treaties and Trade: MEAs and the Multilateral Trading System.
In Trade, Environment, and the Millennium,
edited by
Gary P. Sampson and W. Bradnee Chambers, 271-299. Tokyo: UN
University Press.
Brack, Duncan with Michael Grubb and
Craig Windram. 2000. International Trade and Climate Change
Policies. London: Earthscan, 141 p.
Brack, Duncan, ed. 1998. Trade and the Environment: Conflict or
Compatibility?
London: Earthscan/RIIA, 187 p.
Brack, Duncan, Robert Falkner and Judith Goll. 2003. The next trade
war? GM Products, the Cartagena Protocol and the WTO. The Royal
Institute of International Affairs, Sustainable Development Program
Briefing Paper No. 8.
http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/pdf/research/sdp/Next%20trade
%20war%20GM%20%20CP%20&%20WTO%20Brack%20et%20al%20Sept
%2003.pdf
Bragdon,
Susan, Kathryn Garford and John E. Haapala Jr. 2008. Safeguarding
Biodiversity: The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). In
The Future Control of Food, edited by Geoff Tansey and Tasmin
Rajotte, 82-114. Ottawa and London: Earthscan, IDRC and QUIAP.
Bright, Chris. 1999. The
Nemesis Effect. World*Watch 12 (3): 12-24.
Bronckers, Marco and Reinhard Quick, ed. 2000.
New Directions in International Economic Law - Essays in Honor of
John H. Jackson. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 593 p.
Brosset, Estelle et Ève Truilhé-Marengo, eds. 2006. Les
enjeux de la normalisation technique internationale – Entre
environnement, santé et commerce international.
Aix-en-Provence et Paris : CERIC et La documentation française,
335 p.
Brosset, Estelle et Ève Truilhé-Marengo. 2006. Introduction :
Normes techniques en droit international – Les mots et les
choses… In Les enjeux de la normalisation technique
internationale – Entre environnement, santé et commerce
international, sous la direction d’ Estelle Brosset et Ève
Truilhé-Marengo, 13-42.
Aix-en-Provence et Paris : CERIC et La documentation
française.
Brosset, Estelle. 2002. Le Protocole
biosécurité et le droit communaire. In Le commerce international
des organismes génétiquement modifiés, sous la direction de
Jacques Bourrinet et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 121-147. Paris: CERIC
et La documentation française.
Brown, Peter G. 2000.
Ethics, Economics and International Relations: Transparent
Sovereignty in the Commonwealth of Life. Edinburgh: Edinburgh
University Press.
Brown, Lester. 1981. Building a
Sustainable Society -- A WorldWatch Book. New York: W.W. Norton, 435
p.
Brown
Weiss, Edith. 1990. What Obligation does our Generation Owe to the
Next? An Approach to Global Environmental Responsibility.
American Journal of International Law Vol. 84.
Brown
Weiss, Edith. 1989. In Fairness to Future Generations -
International Law, Common Patrimony, and Intergenerational Equity.
Tokyo: United Nations University.
Brown Weiss, Edith and John H. Jackson, ed. 2001. Reconciling
Environment and Trade. Ardsley, New York: Transnational
Publishers, 820 p.
Buckingham, Donald E. and Peter W.B. Phillips. 2001. Hot Potato, Hot
Potato: Regulating Products of Biotechnology by the International
Community. Journal of World Trade
35 (1): 1-32.
Burkard,
Michael. 1.10.2007. Food Safety Risk Assessment at the International
Level: Do Existing Mechanisms Ensure Unbiased Outcomes? “Based on
Science – Legal Perspective.” NCCR/WTI Workshop Discussion Paper, 8
p.
Burns, William C.G. 2005. Introduction to Special Issue on the
Precautionary Principle and its Operationalization in International
Environmental Regimes and Domestic Policymaking. International
Journal of Global Environmental Issues 5 (1/2) Special Issue on
the Precautionary Principle: 1-9.
Busch, Lawrence, Robin Grove-White,
Sheila Jasanoff, David Winickoff and Brian Wynne. 2004. Amicus
Curiae Brief Submitted to the Dispute Settlement Panel of the
WTO in the case of EC-Biotech (WT/DS291, 292 and 293).
http://csec.lancs.ac.uk/wtoamicus/amicus_brief_wto.pdf and
http://csec.lancs.ac.uk/wtoamicus/Adjudicating_the_GM_Food_Wars.pdf
Caldwell, Lynton Keith. 1984; 1990; 1996
-- 1st- 3rd. ed.
International Environmental
Policy: Emergence and Dimensions.
Durham:
Duke University Press. 496 p. (3rd ed.).
Cameron, James and Karen Campbell. 2002. A Reluctant Global
Policymaker. In
The Greening of Trade Law: International Trade Organizations and
Environmental Issues, edited by Richard H. Steinberg, 23-51.
Oxford, England: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Carpentier, Chantal Line, Kevin P.
Gallagher and Scott Vaughan. 2005. Environmental Goods and Services
in the World Trade Organization. Journal of Trade and Development
(14) 2: 224-225.
Carson, Rachel. 1962.
Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin.
Castells, Nuria and Ramon
Guardans. 2007. The Development of Multilateral Environmental
Agreements on Toxic Chemicals: Integrating the Work of Scientists
and Policy Makers. In Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research,
edited by G. Hirsch Hadorn et al., 173-191. Heidelberg:
Springer.
Chambers, Bradnee W. 2003. Emerging International Rules on the
Commercialization of Genetic Resources: The FAO International Plant
Genetic Treaty and CBD Bonn Guidelines. Journal of World
Intellectual Property
6 (2): 311-329.
Chang, Ha-Joon. 2002.
Kicking Away the Ladder - Development Strategy in Historical
Perspective. London: Anthem Press, 188 p.
Chapman,
Anne. 2007. Democratizing Technology - Risk, Responsibility and the
Regulation of Chemicals. London: Earthscan, 181 p.
Charnovitz, Steve. 2006. Non-Governmental Organizations and
International Law.
American Journal of International Law 100 (2): 348-373.
Charnovitz, Steve. 2003. The World Trade
Organization and Law Enforcement. Journal of World Trade 37
(5): 817-838.
Charnovitz, Steve. 2002. Solving the Production and Processing
Methods (PPM) Puzzle. In
The
Earthscan Reader on International Trade and Sustainable Development,
edited by
Kevin Gallagher and Jacob Werksman,
227-263.
London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
Charnovitz, Steve. 2002. The Supervision of Health and Biodiversity
Regulation by World Trade Rules. In
The Earthscan
Reader on International Trade and Sustainable Development,
edited by
Kevin Gallagher and Jacob Werksman, 265-286.
London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
Charnovitz, Steve. 2002.
Trade Law and Global Governance. London: Cameron May, 540 p.
Charnovitz, Steve. 2001. Solving the Production and Processing
Methods (PPMs) Puzzle. PSIO Occasinal Paper, WTO Series
Number 05. Geneva: Graduate Institute of International Studies
(HEI), 63 p.
Charnovitz, Steve. 2000. The Supervision of Health and Biosafety
Regulation by WTO Rules. Tulane Environmental Law Journal 13
(2): 271-303.
Charnovitz, Steve. 2000. World Trade and the Environment: A Review
of the New WTO Report. Georgetown International Environmental Law
Review, Winter: 523-541.
Charnovitz, Steve. 1999. Improving the Agreement on Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Standards. In
Trade, Environment and the Millennium, edited by Gary Sampson
and W. Bradnee Chambers, 171-195.
Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Charnovitz, Steve. 1996. Competitiveness, Harmonization, and the
Global Ecolonomy. In Agriculture, Trade & the Environment:
Discovering and Measuring the Critical Linkages, edited by Maury
E. Bredahl et al. Westview Press.
Charnovitz, Steve. 1995. Improving Environmental and Trade
Governance.
International Environmental Affairs 7 (1): 59-92.
Charnovitz, Steve. 1992. GATT and the Environment: Examining the
Issues.
International Environmental Affairs 4 (3) Summer: 203-234.
Chatteryee, Pratap and Matthias Finger. 1994.
The Earth Brokers Power, Politics and World Development.
Routledge: London and New York, 192 p.
Chiappetta, Vincent. 2000. The Desirability of Agreeing to Disagree:
The WTO, TRIPS, International IPR Exhaustion and a Few Other Things.
Michigan Journal of International Law 21: 333-392.
Ching, Lim Li & Lim Li Lin. 2005. Brazil, New Zealand block
decision on documentation of GMOs [Biosafety Protocol MOP-2].
Third World Resurgence. June, 178: 2-6.
Ching, Lim Li & Lim Li Lin. 2005.
Slow start towards an international regime on access and
benefit-sharing.
Third World
Resurgence.
March, 175: 8-12.
Chouchena-Rojas, Martha, Manuel Ruiz Muller, David Vivas and
Sebastian Winkler, editors. Disclosure Requirements: Ensuring
mutual supportiveness between the WTO TRIPS Agreement and the CBD.
Gland/Geneva: IUCN, ICTSD, CIEL, IDDRI, QUNO, 49 p.
Christoforou, Theofanis. 2004. The Regulation of Genetically
Modified Organisms in the European Union: The Interplay of Science,
Law and Politics.
Common Market Law Review. 41 (3): 651-655.
Christoforou, Theofanis. 2004. The Precautionary Principle, Risk
Assessment, and the Comparative Role of Science in the EC and the US
Legal Systems. In
Green Giants, Environmental Policies of the US and the EU,
edited by Norman J. Vig and Michael G. Faure, 17-52. MIT Press,
Cambridge, MA.
Christoforou, Theofanis. 2003.
L'expertise scientifique au service du commerce international:
analyses et perspectives.
In
Droit
de l'Organisation Mondiale du Commerce et protection de
l'environnement,
sous la direction de Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 461-485.
Aix-en-Provence et Bruxelles: CERIC et Bruylant.
Christoforou, Theofanis. 2002. Science, Law and Precaution in
Dispute Resolution on Health and Environmental Protection: What Role
for Scientific Experts? In Le commerce international des
organismes génétiquement modifiés, sous la direction de Jacques
Bourrinet et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 213-284. Aix-Marseilles/Paris:
CERIC/La documentation française.
Christoforou, Theofanis. 2000. Settlement of Science-based Trade
Disputes in the WTO: A Critical Review of the Developing Case Law in
the Face of Scientific Uncertainty. New York University
Environmental Law Journal 8 (3): 622-649.
http://www.nyu.edu/pages/elj/issueArchive/vol8/3/v8n3a10.pdf
CIEL. 2005. CIEL Participates in the
Sixth WTO Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong. Summary on Trade
and Environment.
http://www.ciel.org/Tae/WTO_Ministerial_Dec05.html
CIEL and Friends of the Earth-US. 2005.
Free Trade Agreements & Sustainable Development: The Divide &
Conquer Strategy. Hong Kong Briefing Paper, December 2005.
http://www.ciel.org/Publications/Hong_Kong_Brief_DRAFT.pdf
CIEL, FOE – US, Defenders of
Wildlife, IATP, OCA – USA. 2004. Amicus Curiae Brief Submitted
to the Dispute Settlement Panel of the WTO in the case of
EC-Biotech EC-Biotech (WT/DS/291, 292, and 293).
http://www.ciel.org/Publications/ECBiotech_AmicusBrief_2June04.pdf
and
http://www.ciel.org/Publications/WTOBiotech_Motion_June04.pdf
Clapp, Jennifer. 2005. Global
Environmental Governance for Corporate Responsibility and
Accountability. Global Environmental Politics 5 (3): 23-35.
Clapp, Jennifer and Peter Dauvergne. 2005. Paths to A Green
World: The Political Economy of the Global Environment.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Colborn, Theo, Dianne Dumanoski, and John Peterson Myers. 1996.
Our Stolen Future -- are we Threatening our Fertility,
Intelligence, and Survival? A Scientific Detective Story.
New York: Plume/Penguin Group, 317 p.
Cole, Matthew A. 1999. Examining the Environmental Case Against Free
Trade. Journal of World Trade
33 (5): 183-196.
Coleman, William D. and Melissa Gabler. 2002. Agricultural
Biotechnology and Regime Formation: A Constructivist Assessment of
the Prospects. International Studies Quarterly
46: 481-507.
Collins,
Lynda. 2007. Environmental Rights for the Future? Intergenerational
Equity in the EU. RECIEL 16 (3): 321-332.
Commission of the European
Communities, Brussels, 02.02.2000, COM(2000) 1, Communication
from the Commission on the precautionary principle.
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdf
Cooper, David H. 2002. The International Treaty on Plant Genetic
Resources for Food and Agriculture. RECIEL 11 (1): 1-16.
Cooper, David. 1993. The International Undertaking on Plant Genetic
Resources. Plant Genetic Resources 2 (2): 158-167.
Cooper, David E. and Palmer, Joy A. 1995.
Just Environments: Intergenerational, International and
Interspecies Issues. London and New York: Routledge,
200 p.
Cordonier Segger, Marie-Claire and
Ashfaq Khalfan. 2004. Sustainable Development Law: Principles,
Practices and Prospects. Oxford: Oxford U Press, 465 p.
Correa, Carlos M. 2000.
Intellectual Property Rights, the WTO and Developing Countries:
The TRIPs Agreement and Policy Options. Penang, Malaysia: TWN.
Cosbey,
Aaron, Simon Tay, Hank Lim and Matthew Walls. 2005. The Rush to
Regionalism: Sustainable Development and Regional/Bilateral
Approaches to Trade and Investment Liberalization. Winnipeg: IISD/IDRC
Scoping Paper, 46 p.
http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2005/trade_rush_region.pdf
Cosbey, Aaron. 2000. A Forced Evolution? The Codex Alimentarius
Commission, Scientific Uncertainty and the Precautionary Principle.
Research Paper, International Institute for Sustainable Development,
Winnipeg, Canada, 14 p.
Cosbey, Aaron and Stas Burgiel. 2000. The Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety: an Analysis of Results. Briefing Note, International
Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Canada, (ww.iisd.ca).
Cottier,
Thomas. 2008. Genetic
Engineering, Trade and Human Rights. In Genetic Engineering and
the World Trade System -- World Trade Forum,
edited by Daniel
Wüger and Thomas Cottier, 17-56.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Cottier, Thomas. 2002. Implications for Trade Law and Policy:
Towards Convergence and Integration. In The Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety, edited by Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner and Helen
Marquard, 467-482.
London: Earthscan/RIIA.
Cottier, Thomas. 2001. Risk Management Experience in WTO Dispute
Settlement. In Globalization and the Environment – Risk
Assessment and the WTO,
edited by David Robertson and Aynsley Kellow, 41-63.
Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar Publ.
Cottier, Thomas. 1998. The Protection of Genetic Ressources and
Traditional Knowledge: Towards More Specific Rights and Obligations
in World Trade Law Today. Journal of International Economic Law
1 (4): 555-585.
Cuchet, Isabelle et Isabelle Masingue.
2005. OGM - Coup de tonnerre chinois! Science et Vie, Juillet
2005, 128-138.
Cullet, Philippe. 2005. Monsanto vs. Schmeiser, Analysis.
Journal of Environmental Law 17 (1): 102-109.
Cullet, Phillippe. 2005. Intellectual Property
Protection and Sustainable Development. New Delhi:
LexisNexis Butterworths, 463 p.
Cullet, Philippe. 2004. Food Security and Intellectual Property
Rights in Developing Countries. Les cahiers du RIBios 6.
71 p.
Cullet, Philippe. 2003.
Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law.
Aldershot, Hampshire, UK: Ashgate, 214 p.
Cullet, Philippe. 2001. Plant Variety Protection in Africa: toward
Compliance with the TRIPS Agreement. Journal of African Law
(Cambridge U Press):
45 (1).
Cullet, Philippe. 1999. Revision of the TRIPS Agreement Concerning
the Protection of Plant Varieties - Lessons from India. Journal
of World Intellectual Property 2 (4): 617-657.
Das, Orijit. 2000. Patenting and Ownership of Genes and Life Forms.
Journal of World Intellectual Property 3 (4): 577-588.
Daschle, Tom,
C. Ford Runge, and Benjamin Senauer.
2007. A Debate: Food for
Fuel? Foreign Affairs 86 (5):157-163.
Dauvergne, Peter, editor. 2005. Handbook of Global
Environmental Politics. Cheltenham, Glos UK, 560 p.
Dauvergne, Peter. 2005. Cancer and
Global Environmental Politics: Proposing a New Research Agenda.
Global Environmental Politics 5 (3): 6-14.
Deblock, Christian. 2002.
L’Organisation mondiale du commerce: Où s’en va la
mondialisation?
Montréal : Les Editions Fides.
De
Sadeleer, Nicolas et Charles-Hubert Born. 2004. Droit
international et communautaire de la biodiversité. Paris:
Dalloz, 800 p.
de Sadeleer, Nicolas. 2002. Environmental Principles: From
Political Slogans to Legal Rules. Oxford, UK: Oxford University
Press, 434 p.
Dosi, Giovanni. 1988. The Nature of the
Innovative Process, in Technical Change and Economic Theory,
edited by Giovanni Dosi, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerald
Silverberg and Luc Soete.
London: Pinter Publishers, 656 p.
Douma, Wybe Th. 2001. How Safe is Safe? The EU, the USA and the WTO
- Codex Alimentarius Debate on Food Safety. In The EU and the
International Legal Order: Discord or Harmony? edited by V.
Kronenberger, 181-198. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.
Dratwa, Jim.
2004. Social Learning with the Precautionary Principle at the
European Commission and the Codex Alimentarius.
In Decision
Making within International Organizations, edited by
Bob Reinalda
and Bertjan Verbeek, 215-229.
London and New
York: Routledge.
Dryzek, John S. and David Schlosberg, eds. 2005. The
Environmental Politics Reader: Debating the Earth. Oxford
University Press.
Dutfield,
Graham. 2008. Turning Plant Varieties into Intellectual Property:
The UPOV Convention. In The Future Control of Food, edited by
Geoff Tansey and Tasmin Rajotte, 27-48. Ottawa and London:
Earthscan, IDRC and QUIAP.
Dutfield, Graham. 2004. National
Systems for Protecting TK: Experiences in Selected Developing
Countries. In Protecting and
Promoting Traditional Knowledge: Systems, National Experiences and
International Dimensions, edited
by Sophia Twarog and Promilia Kapoor, 141-155. Geneva: UNCTAD.
Dutfield, Graham. 2000.
Intellectual Property Rights, Trade and Biodiversity: Seeds and
Plant Varieties. Gland/Geneva and London: IUCN and Earthscan,
239 p.
Echols, Marsha. 2001.
Food Safety and the WTO – The Interplay of Culture, Science, and
Technology. New York : Kluwer Law International, 180 p.
Eckersley, Robyn. 2004. The Big Chill: The WTO and Multilateral
Environmental Agreements. Global Environmental Politics 4
(2): 24-50.
Eckersley, Robyn. 2005.
A Green Public
Sphere in the WTO : The Amicus Curiae Interventions in the
Trans-Atlantic Biotech Dispute. EcoLomic Policy and Law 2
(2).
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Economy, Elizabeth. 2007.
The Great Leap Backward? The Costs of China’s Environmental Crisis.
Foreign Affairs 86 (5): 38-61.
Ehrlich, Paul R. 1968.
The Population Bomb. New York: Ballantine Books, 224 p.
Ehrlich, Paul R. and John P.
Holdren. 1988. The Cassandra Conference – Resources and the Human
Predicament. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University Press,
332 p.
Ellis, Jaye. 2001. The Straddling Fish Stocks Agreement and the
Precautionary Principle as Interpretative Device and Rule of Law.
Ocean Development & International Law 32: 289-312.
Eggers, B. and Ruth Mackenzie. 2000. The Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety.
Journal of International Economic Law 3 (3): 525-543.
Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter. 2002. Some Personal Experiences as Member
of the Appellate Body of the WTO. Policy Paper 02/9.
Florence: The Robert Schumann Centre for Advanced Studies, European
University Institute.
EMPA/ETHZ.
2007. Ökobilanz von Energieprodukten: Ökologische Bewertung von
Biotreibstoffen, Schlussbericht
http://www.news-service.admin.ch/NSBSubscriber/message/attachments/8514.pdf
Esty, Daniel. 1998. Non-Governmental Organizations at the World
Trade Organization: Cooperation, Competition, or Exclusion.
Journal of International Economic Law: 123-147.
Esty, Daniel. 1994. Greening the GATT - Trade, Environment and
the Future.
Washington DC: Institute for International Economics, 320 p.
Esty, Daniel C. and Geradin, Damien. 1998. Environmental Protection
and International Competitiveness. Journal of World Trade 32
(3): 5-46.
Etchelar, Émilie. 2006. Expertise
scientifique et normalization. Le cas du Codex
alimentarius. In Les enjeux de la normalisation technique
internationale – Entre environnement, santé et commerce
international, sous la direction d’ Estelle Brosset et Ève
Truilhé-Marengo, 159-174. Aix-en-Provence et Paris :
CERIC et La documentation française.
Falkner, Robert. 2003. Private Environmental Governance and
International Relations: Exploring the Links. Global
Environmental Politics 3 (2): 72-88.
Falkner,
Robert.
2000. Regulating Biotech Trade: the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.
International Affairs, RIIA, Special Biodiversity Issue
76 (2): 299-313.
Falkner,
Robert and Aarti Gupta. 2004. Implementing the Biosafety
Protocol: Key Challenges. Chatham House Sustainable
Development Work Programme. 12 p.
Farrell, Alexander E. and Jill Jäger, eds. 2005. Assessments
of Regional and Global Environmental Risks: Designing Processes for
the Effective Use of Science in Decisionmaking.
Washington D.C.: RFF Press.
FAO
and WHO. 2005 Rome and Geneva: Codex Alimentarius Procedures Manaual, 15th Edition.
ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/Publications/ProcManuals/Manual_15e.pdf
FAO
and WHO. 1999. Rome and Geneva: Understanding the Codex
Alimentarius.
http://www.fao.org/docrep/w9114e/W9114e00.htm .
FIELD. 2004. On behalf of the
following coalition of organisations: GeneWatch UK; Foundation
for International Environmental Law and Development (FIELD);
Five Year Freeze; Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB);
The Center for Food Safety; Council of Canadians; Polaris
Institute; Grupo de Reflexión Rural Argentina; Center for Human
Rights and the Environment (CEDHA); Gene Campaign; Forum for
Biotechnology and Food Security; Fundación Sociedades
Sustentables; Greenpeace International; Californians for GE-Free
Agriculture; International Forum on Globalisation. Amicus Curiae
Brief Submitted to the Dispute Settlement Panel of the WTO in
the case of EC-Biotech (WT/DS291, 292 and 293).
http://www.field.org.uk/PDF/gm.amicus.finaL.doc.pdf
Fitze,
Urs. 2006. Impossible de démontrer l’innocuité du rayonnement.
Environnement (Office fédéral de l’environnement, Berne) 2,
47-49.
Footer, Mary E. 2000. Intellectual Property and Agrobiodiversity:
Towards Private Ownership of the Genetic Commons. In Yearbook of
International Environmental Law, Volume 10 1999, edited by Jutta
Brunnée and Ellen Hey, 48-82. Oxford and New York: Oxford University
Press.
Foster,
Caroline E. 2005. Social Science Experts and Amicus Curiae
briefs in International Courts and Tribunals: The WTO
Biotech Case. Netherlands International Law Review
LII: 433-460.
Gallagher, Kevin P. and Jacob Werksman,
ed. 2002. The Earthscan Reader on International Trade and
Sustainable Development. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan, 406 p.
Gallagher, Peter. 2002. Guide to
Dispute Settlement. The Hague and Geneva: Kluwer Law
International and WTO, 149 p.
Gandhi, Samir R. 2005.
Regulating the Use of Voluntary Environmental Standards Within the
WTO Legal Regime: Making a Case for Developing Countries. Journal
of World Trade 39 (5): 855-880.
Garforth, Kathryn, Hari Subramaniam, Aseet Dalvi and Barbara Cuber.
2005. Supreme Court of Canada 21 May 2004, Percy Schmeiser vs.
Monsanto Canada. Review of European Community and International
Environmental Law (RECIEL).
13 (3): 340-346.
Gladwell, Malcolm. 2000. The Tipping Point: How Little Things can
Make a Big Difference. Boston: Little Brown.
Goldstein, Judith L., Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, and
Anne-Marie Slaughter, eds. 2001. Legalization and World Politics.
Cambridge, MA: IO Foundation and MIT Press, 320 p.
Goldstein, Judith and Lisa L. Martin. 2001. Legalization, Trade
Liberalization and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note. In
Legalization and World Politics, edited by Judith L. Goldstein,
Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, and Anne-Marie Slaughter,
219-249. Cambridge, MA: IO Foundation and MIT Press.
Gopo, Joseph and Patricia Kameri-Mbote. 2005. Biotechnology: A
Turning Point in Development or an Opportunity that Will Be
Missed? In Trading in Genes - Development Perspectives on
Biotechnology, Trade and Sustainability, edited by
Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz and Vicente Sánchez, 37-57. London:
Earthscan.
Gore, Al, Vice President. 1992. Earth in the Balance - Ecology
and the Human Spirit. New York: Penguin Books USA, 409 p.
Gower, Barry S. 1995. The Environment and Justice for Future
Generations. In
Just Environments: Intergenerational, International and
Interspecies Issues, edited by David E. Cooper and Joy A.
Palmer, 49-59. London and New York: Routledge, 200 p.
Guay, Louis. 2002 The Science and Policy of Global Biodiversity
Protection. In Governing Global Biodiversity: The Evolution and
Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity, edited
by Philippe G. Le Prestre, 207-233. Aldershot, Hampshire:
Ashgate Publishing.
Gupta, Aarti. 2002. Ensuring ‘Safe Use’ of Biotechnology: Key
Challenges.
Economic and Political Weekly XXXVII (27), July 6: 2762-2770.
Gupta, Aarti. 2001. Advance Informed Agreement: A Shared Basis for
Governing Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms? Indiana
Journal of Global Legal Studies 9 (1): 265-282.
Gupta, Aarti. 2000. Governing Trade in Genetically Modified
Organisms - the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Environment,
May: 22-34.
Gupta, Aarti. 2000. Creating a Global Biosafety Regime.
International Journal of Biotechnology 2 (1-3): 205-230.
Gupta, Anil K. 2004. WIPO-UNEP Study on
the Role of IPRs in the Sharing of Benefits Arising from the Use of
Biological Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge. Study No.
4 on IP/GR and TK. Geneva: UNEP and WIPO, 165 p. plus Annex.
Haas, Peter M. 2004. Addressing the Global Governance Deficit.
Global Environmental Politics
4 (4): 1-16.
Haas, Peter M. 1990. Obtaining International Environmental
Protection through Epistemic Epistemic Consensus. Millennium:
Journal of International Studies 19 (3): 347-365.
Haas, Peter M., Robert O. Keohane, and Marc A. Levy. 1993.
Institutions for the Earth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 449 p.
Haas,
Richard N. 2008. The Age of Nonpolarity. Foreign Affairs 87
(3): 44-57.
Häberli, Christian. 2000. The WTO
Dispute Settlement Procedure: Implications for Agriculture Trade
Arising from the Bananas Case. In Negotiating the Future of
Agricultural Policies: Agricultural Trade and the Millennium WTO
Round, ed. by Spencer Henson, 211-225. The Hague: Kluwer.
Halewood,
Michael and Kent Nnadozie. 2008. Giving Priority to the Commons: The
International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources (ITPGRFA). In In
The Future Control of Food, edited by Geoff Tansey and Tasmin
Rajotte, 115-140. Ottawa and London: Earthscan, IDRC and QUIAP.
Halle,
Mark. 2007. Fixing the Domestic Trade Policy Process: Making
Room for Sustainable Development. In Process Matters --
Sustainable Development and Domestic Trade Policy, edited by
Mark Halle and and Robert Wolfe, 265-276. Winnipeg: ICTSD.
Halle,
Mark and Robert Wolfe, Editors. 2007. Process Matters --
Sustainable Development and Domestic Trade Policy. Winnipeg:
IISD, 277 p.
Halweil, Peter. 2000. Where have all the Farmers gone?
World*Watch 13 (5): 12-30.
Hansen, Bjorn G. and Mark
Blainey. 2006. REACH: A Step Change in the Management of Chemicals.
RECIEL 15 (3): 270-280.
Henson, Spencer. 2000. Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Measures in a Global Context: Trade Liberalization
versus Domestic Protection. In Negotiating the Future of
Agricultural Policies: Agricultural Trade and the Millennium WTO
Round, edited by Spencer Henson, 157-183. The Hague: Kluwer.
Hermitte, Marie-Angèle
et Christine Noiville. 2002. Marrakesh et Carthagène comme figures
opposées du commerce international.
In
Le commerce international des organismes génétiquement modifiés,
edited by Jacques Bourrinet et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 317-351.
Paris : CERIC et La documentation française.
Herwig, Alexia. 2001. Legal and institutional aspects in the
negotiation of a Codex Alimentarius Convention. Zeitschrift für
das gesamte Lebensmittelrecht 2: 259-280.
Hill, Ryan, Sam Johnston and Cyrie Sendashonga. 2005. Risk
Assessment and Precaution in the Biosafety Protocol. Review of
European Community and International Environmental Law (RECIEL,
13 (3): 263-269.
Hobbs, Ann L., Jill E. Hobbs and William A. Kerr. 2005. The
Biosafety Protocol: Multilateral Agreement or Protecting the
Environment or Protectionist Club? Journal of World Trade 39
(2): 281-300.
Hoekman, Bernard M. and Petros C. Mavroidis. 2000. WTO Dispute
Settlement, Transparency and Surveillance. The World Economy
23 (4): 529-543.
Hoffmann,
Stanley. 2002. Clash of Globalizations. Foreign Affairs 81
(4): 104-116.
Hoffmann, Ulrich. 2004. Specific trade
obligations in MEAs and their relationship with the rules of the
multilateral trading system - A developing country perspective.
In Trade and Environment Review 2003, edited by René Vossenaar and Ulrich Hoffmann.
Geneva: UNCTAD, 1-33.
Holbrooke,
Richard. 2008. The Next President. Foreign Affairs 87 (5):
2-25.
