Bibliography:
WTO Law and Science
Abdel Motaal, Doaa. 2005. Is the World Trade Organization
Anti-Precaution? Journal of World Trade 39 (3): 483-502.
Abdel
Motaal, Doaa. 2004. The “Multilateral Scientific Consensus” and the World
Trade Organization. Journal of World Trade 38 (5): 855-876.
‘Academics’ Amicus curiae Report.’ 2004. See
Busch, Lawrence, Robin Grove-White, Sheila Jasanoff, David
Winickoff and Brian Wynne.
Ackermann, Frank.
2008. Poisoned for Pennies - The Economics of Toxics and Precaution.
Washington and London: Island Press, 318 p.
Aguilar, Soledead, Karen Alvarenga, Pia M. Kohler, Kati Kulovesi
and Elsa Tsioumani. 2006. Third Meeting of the Parties to the
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. IISD-Environmental
Negotiations Bulletin 9 (351): 1-12. http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb09351e.pdf
Allbeury, Kerry et Ève Truilhé.
2002. La preuve dans le règlement des différends à l'OMC - Applications
possibles en matière d'OGM?
In Le commerce international des organismes
génétiquement modifiés, edited by Jacques Bourrinet et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois,
285-305. Paris : CERIC et La
documentation française.
Anderson, Alun.
2002. In den Proteinen ist die Wahrheit.
Das TA Magazin
49: 58-59.
Appleton, Arthur E. 2000. The Labeling of GMO Products Pursuant to
International Trade Rules. New York University Environmental Law Journal
8 (3): 1-13.
http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/envtllaw/issues/vol8/3/v8n3a4.pdf
Appleton, Arthur E. 1999. Environmental Labelling Schemes: WTO Law and
Developing Country Implications. In Gary P. Sampson and W. Bradnee Chambers,
ed., Trade, Environment and the Millennium. Tokyo, Japan: United
Nations University, 195-223.
Bail, Christoph, Robert Falkner and Helen Marquard, eds. 2002. The Cartagena
Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment
and Development? London: Earthscan/RIIA, 579 p.
Barrios, Paula. 2004. The Rotterdam
Convention on Hazardous Chemicals: A Meaningful Step Toward Environmental
Protection?
Georgetown
International Environmental Law Review,
Summer issue
(online version).
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3970/is_200407/ai_n9429400
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3970/is_200407/ai_n9429400/pg_3
Baumüller, Heike. 2005. Trade in Biotechnology: Development and the Clash
of Collective Preferences. In Trading in Genes - Development Perspectives
on Biotechnology, Trade and Sustainability, edited by
Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz and Vicente Sánchez, 57-77. London: Earthscan.
Baumüller, Heike. 2003. Domestic Import Regulations for Genetically
Modified Organisms and their Compatibility with WTO Rules - Some Key Issues
(IISD-ICTSD Trade Knowledge Network),
http://www.tradeknowledgenetwork.net/publication.aspx?id=587.
Bereano, Phil and
Martin Phillipson. 2004.
Goliath vs. Schmeiser.
Gene Watch
17 (4).
http://www.gene-watch.org/genewatch/articles/17-4Bereano.html
Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Nathalie. 2001. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety:
A Multilateral Approach to Regulate GMOs. In Reconciling Environment and
Trade, edited by Edith Brown Weiss and John H. Jackson, 689-723.
New York: Transnational Publishers.
Bernauer, Thomas. 2003. Genes, Trade, and
Regulation - the Seeds of Conflict in Food Biotechnology. Princeton and
Oxford: Princeton University Press,
230 p.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence.
2006. Normes, standards et règles en droit
international. In Les enjeux de la normalisation technique
internationale – Entre environnement, santé et commerce
international, sous la direction d’ Estelle Brosset et Ève
Truilhé-Marengo, 43-56. Aix-en-Provence et Paris : CERIC
et La documentation française.
Boisson de
Chazournes, Laurence. 2003. Conclusions. In La sécurité alimentaire dans
l’Union européenne, sous la direction de Jacques Bourrinet et Francis
Snyder, 177-184. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. 2003.
Le rôle des organes de règlement des différends de l'OMC dans le
développement du droit international de l'environnement: entre le
marteau et l'enclume.
In Droit de l'Organisation Mondiale du Commerce et protection
de l'environnement, sous la direction de Sandrine Maljean-Dubois,
379-400.
Aix-en-Provence et Bruxelles: CERIC et Bruylant.
Boisson de
Chazournes, Laurence. 2002. Le principe de précaution: Nature, contenu et
limites. In Le principe de précaution: Aspects de droit international et
communautaire, sous la direction de Charles Leben et Joe Verhoeven,
65-94. Paris : Editions Panthéon Assas.
Boisson de Chazournes,
Laurence and Makane Moïse Mbengue.
2008. Trade, Environment and
Biotechnology: on Coexistence and Coherence. In Genetic Engineering and
the World Trade System -- World Trade Forum,
edited by Daniel Wüger
and Thomas Cottier, 205-245.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Boisson
de Chazournes, Laurence and Makane Moïse Mbengue. 2007. A Propos
du principe du soutien mutuel -- les relations entre le Protocole de
Cartagena et les accords de l'OMC. Revue Générale du Droit International
Public. Numéro 4: 829-863.
Boisson de
Chazournes, Laurence and Makane Moïse Mbengue. 2006. International
Legal Aspects of the Co-Existence between GM and non-GM
products: Approaches under International Environmental Law and
International Law. Montpellier: GMCC Proceedings, 15-29.
Boisson de Chazournes,
Laurence and Urs P. Thomas, Editors. 2006. WTO Law, Science and Risk
Communication.
EcoLomic Policy
and Law, Vol.
3 Special
Edition, 115 p.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence
and Makane Moïse Mbengue. 2005.
GMOs and Trade : Issues
at Stake in the EC Biotech Dispute. Review of European Community and
International Environmental Law (RECIEL). 13 (3): 289-305.
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence and Urs P. Thomas,
Editors. 2000. The Biosafety
Protocol: Regulatory Innovation and Emerging Trends. Swiss Review of
International and European Law 10 (4): 513-559.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/biosa_lbc_upt_etal_bp_regulatory_innov_emerging_trends_
rsdie_00_4.pdf
Bonny, Sylvie. 2003. Why are Most Europeans Opposed to GMOs?
Factors Explaining Rejection of France and Europe. Electronic
Journal of Biotechnology 6 (1), April 15.
http://www.ejbiotechnology.info/content/vol6/issue1/full/4/
Bordogna Petriccione, Barbara. 2004. Introduction to GMOs: Techniques and
Safety. Les cahiers du RIBios 1, 74 p.
Bossis, G. 2001. Les OGM, entre liberté des échanges et précaution. Revue
européenne de droit de l'environnement 3: 255-273.
Bourg, Dominique et Jean-Louis
Schlegel. 2001. Parer aux risques de demain : le principe de précaution.
Paris : Éditions
du Seuil, 185 p.
Bourrinet, Jacques et Sandrine
Maljean-Dubois, éd. 2002. Le commerce international des organismes
génétiquement modifiés.
Aix-Marseille/Paris:
CERIC/La documentations française. 384 p.
Brack,
Duncan, Robert Falkner and Judith Goll. 2003. The next trade war? GM
Products, the Cartagena Protocol and the WTO. The Royal Institute of
International Affairs, Sustainable Development Program Briefing Paper No. 8.
http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/pdf/research/sdp/Next%20trade
%20war%20GM%20%20CP%20&%20WTO%20Brack%20et%20al%20Sept
%2003.pdf
Brosset, Estelle
et Ève Truilhé-Marengo, eds. 2006. Les enjeux de la
normalisation technique internationale – Entre environnement,
santé et commerce international. Aix-en-Provence et Paris :
CERIC et La documentation française, 335 p.
Brosset, Estelle
et Ève Truilhé-Marengo. 2006. Introduction : Normes techniques
en droit international – Les mots et les choses… In Les
enjeux de la normalisation technique internationale – Entre
environnement, santé et commerce international, sous la
direction d’ Estelle Brosset et Ève Truilhé-Marengo, 13-42.
Aix-en-Provence et Paris : CERIC et La documentation
française.
Brosset, Estelle. 2002. Le Protocole
biosécurité et le droit communaire. In Le commerce international des
organismes génétiquement modifiés, sous la direction de Jacques
Bourrinet et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 121-147. Paris: CERIC et La
documentation française.
Brown Weiss,
Edith. 1990. What Obligation does our Generation Owe to the Next? An
Approach to Global Environmental Responsibility. American Journal of
International Law Vol. 84.
Brown Weiss,
Edith. 1989. In Fairness to Future Generations - International Law,
Common Patrimony, and Intergenerational Equity. Tokyo: United Nations
University.
Buckingham, Donald E. and Peter W.B. Phillips. 2001. Hot Potato, Hot Potato:
Regulating Products of Biotechnology by the International Community.
Journal of World Trade 35 (1): 1-32.
Burkard, Michael.
1.10.2007. Food Safety Risk Assessment at the International Level: Do
Existing Mechanisms Ensure Unbiased Outcomes? “Based on Science – Legal
Perspective.” NCCR/WTI Workshop Discussion Paper, 8 p.
Burns, William C.G. 2005. Introduction to Special Issue on the Precautionary
Principle and its Operationalization in International Environmental Regimes
and Domestic Policymaking. International Journal of Global Environmental
Issues 5 (1/2) Special Issue on the Precautionary Principle: 1-9.
Busch, Lawrence, Robin
Grove-White, Sheila Jasanoff, David Winickoff and Brian Wynne.
2004. Amicus Curiae Brief Submitted to the Dispute Settlement
Panel of the WTO in the case of EC-Biotech (WT/DS291, 292
and 293).
http://csec.lancs.ac.uk/wtoamicus/amicus_brief_wto.pdf
and
http://csec.lancs.ac.uk/wtoamicus/Adjudicating_the_GM_Food_Wars.pdf
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity,
text. 2000. Adopted in Montréal, January 29.
http://www.biodiv.org/biosafety/protocol.asp
Castells, Nuria and Ramon
Guardans. 2007. The Development of Multilateral Environmental
Agreements on Toxic Chemicals: Integrating the Work of Scientists
and Policy Makers. In Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research,
edited by G. Hirsch Hadorn et al., 173-191. Heidelberg:
Springer.
Chapman, Anne.
2007. Democratizing Technology - Risk, Responsibility and the Regulation of
Chemicals. London: Earthscan, 181 p.
Charnovitz, Steve. 2000. The Supervision of Health and Biosafety Regulation
by WTO Rules. Tulane Environmental Law Journal 13 (2): 271-303.
Charnovitz, Steve. 1999. Improving the Agreement on Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Standards. In Trade, Environment and the Millennium,
edited by Gary Sampson and W. Bradnee Chambers, 171-195. Tokyo:
United Nations University Press.
Ching, Lim Li & Lim Li Lin. 2005. Brazil, New Zealand block
decision on documentation of GMOs [Biosafety Protocol MOP-2].
Third World Resurgence. June, 178: 2-6.
Ching, Lim Li & Lim Li Lin. 2005. Slow start towards an
international regime on access and benefit-sharing.
Third World
Resurgence.
March, 175: 8-12.
Christoforou,
Theofanis. 2004. The Precautionary Principle, Risk Assessment, and the
Comparative Role of Science in the EC and the US Legal Systems. In Green
Giants, Environmental Policies of the US and the EU, edited by Norman J.
Vig and Michael G. Faure, 17-52.
MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Christoforou, Theofanis. 2004. The Regulation of Genetically Modified
Organisms in the European Union: The Interplay of Science, Law and Politics.
Common Market Law Review. 41 (3): 651-655.
Christoforou, Theofanis. 2003.
L'expertise scientifique au service du commerce international:
analyses et perspectives.
In
Droit
de l'Organisation Mondiale du Commerce et protection de
l'environnement,
sous la direction de Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 461-485. Aix-en-Provence
et Bruxelles: CERIC et Bruylant.
Christoforou,
Theofanis. 2002. Science, Law and Precaution in Dispute Resolution on Health
and Environmental Protection: What Role for Scientific Experts?
In Le commerce international des
organismes génétiquement modifiés, sous la direction de Jacques
Bourrinet et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 213-284.
Aix-Marseilles/Paris:
CERIC/La documentation française.
Christoforou, Theofanis. 2000. Settlement of Science-based Trade Disputes in
the WTO: A Critical Review of the Developing Case Law in the Face of
Scientific Uncertainty. New York University Environmental Law Journal
8 (3): 622-649.
http://www.nyu.edu/pages/elj/issueArchive/vol8/3/v8n3a10.pdf
CIEL, FOE – US, Defenders of
Wildlife, IATP, OCA – USA. 2004. Amicus Curiae Brief Submitted
to the Dispute Settlement Panel of the WTO in the case of
EC-Biotech EC-Biotech (WT/DS/291, 292, and 293).
http://www.ciel.org/Publications/ECBiotech_AmicusBrief_2June04.pdf
and
http://www.ciel.org/Publications/WTOBiotech_Motion_June04.pdf
Commission of the European
Communities, Brussels, 02.02.2000, COM(2000) 1, Communication
from the Commission on the precautionary principle.
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdf
Cosbey, Aaron and Stas Burgiel. 2000. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety:
an Analysis of Results. Briefing Note, International Institute for
Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Canada, (ww.iisd.ca).
Cosbey, Aaron. 2000. A Forced Evolution? The Codex Alimentarius Commission,
Scientific Uncertainty and the Precautionary Principle. Research Paper,
International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Canada, 14 p.
Cottier, Thomas. 2008.
Genetic Engineering, Trade
and Human Rights. In Genetic Engineering and the World Trade System --
World Trade Forum,
edited by Daniel Wüger
and Thomas Cottier, 17-56.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Cottier, Thomas. 2002. Implications for Trade Law and Policy: Towards
Convergence and Integration. In The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety,
edited by Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner and Helen Marquard, 467-482.
London: Earthscan/RIIA.
Cottier, Thomas. 2001. Risk Management Experience in WTO Dispute Settlement.
In Globalization and the Environment – Risk Assessment and the WTO,
edited by David Robertson and Aynsley Kellow, 41-63. Cheltenham, UK
and Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar Publ.
Cuchet, Isabelle et Isabelle Masingue.
2005. OGM - Coup de tonnerre chinois! Science et Vie, Juillet
2005, 128-138.
Cullet,
Philippe. 2005. Monsanto vs. Schmeiser, Analysis. Journal of
Environmental Law 17 (1): 102-109.
Daschle, Tom, C. Ford
Runge, and Benjamin Senauer.
2007. A Debate: Food for Fuel? Foreign Affairs 86 (5):157-163.
Dauvergne, Peter. 2005. Cancer and
Global Environmental Politics: Proposing a New Research Agenda.
Global Environmental Politics 5 (3): 6-14.
De Sadeleer,
Nicolas et Charles-Hubert Born. 2004. Droit international et
communautaire de la biodiversité. Paris: Dalloz, 800 p.
de
Sadeleer, Nicolas. 2002. Environmental Principles: From Political Slogans
to Legal Rules. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 434 p.
Douma,
Wybe Th. 2001. How Safe is Safe? The EU, the USA and the WTO - Codex
Alimentarius Debate on Food Safety. In The EU and the International Legal
Order: Discord or Harmony? edited by V. Kronenberger, 181-198. The
Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.
Eckersley, Robyn. 2005.
A Green Public Sphere
in the WTO : The Amicus Curiae Interventions in the Trans-Atlantic
Biotech Dispute. EcoLomic Policy and Law 2 (2).
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Eggers B. and Ruth Mackenzie. 2000. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.
Journal of International Economic Law 3 (3): 525-543.
Ellis, Jaye. 2001. The Straddling Fish Stocks Agreement and the
Precautionary Principle as Interpretative Device and Rule of Law. Ocean
Development & International Law 32: 289-312.
Falkner, Robert. 2000. Regulating Biotech Trade: the Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety. International Affairs, RIIA, Special Biodiversity Issue 76
(2): 299-313.
Falkner,
Robert and Aarti Gupta. 2004. Implementing the Biosafety
Protocol: Key Challenges. Chatham House Sustainable
Development Work Programme. 12 p.
Farrell, Alexander E. and Jill Jäger, eds. 2005. Assessments
of Regional and Global Environmental Risks: Designing Processes
for the Effective Use of Science in Decisionmaking.
Washington D.C.: RFF Press.
Fitze, Urs.
2006. Impossible de démontrer l’innocuité du rayonnement.
Environnement (Office fédéral de l’environnement, Berne) 2,
47-49.
Foster,
Caroline E. 2005. Social Science Experts and Amicus Curiae
briefs in International Courts and Tribunals: The WTO
Biotech Case. Netherlands International Law Review
LII: 433-460.
Garforth, Kathryn, Hari Subramaniam, Aseet Dalvi and Barbara Cuber. 2005.
Supreme Court of Canada 21 May 2004, Percy Schmeiser vs. Monsanto Canada.
Review of European Community and International Environmental Law (RECIEL)
13 (3): 340-346.
Gopo, Joseph and Patricia Kameri-Mbote. 2005. Biotechnology: A
Turning Point in Development or an Opportunity that Will Be
Missed? In Trading in Genes
- Development Perspectives on Biotechnology, Trade and
Sustainability, edited by Ricardo
Meléndez-Ortiz and Vicente Sánchez, 37-57. London:
Earthscan.
Guay,
Louis. 2002 The Science and Policy of Global Biodiversity Protection. In
Governing Global Biodiversity: The Evolution and Implementation of the
Convention on Biological Diversity, edited by Philippe G. Le Prestre,
207-233. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.
Gupta, Aarti. 2002. Ensuring ‘Safe Use’ of Biotechnology: Key Challenges.
Economic and Political Weekly XXXVII (27): July 6, 2762-2770.
Gupta, Aarti. 2001. Advance Informed Agreement: A Shared Basis for Governing
Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms? Indiana Journal of Global Legal
Studies 9 (1): 265-282.
Gupta, Aarti. 2000. Governing Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms - the
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Environment, May, 22-34.
Gupta, Aarti. 2000. Creating a Global Biosafety Regime. International
Journal of Biotechnology 2 (1/2/3): 205-230.
Halweil, Peter. 2000. Where have all the Farmers gone? World*Watch 13
(5): 12-30.
Henson, Spencer. 2000. Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Measures in a Global Context: Trade Liberalization versus
Domestic Protection. In Negotiating the Future of Agricultural Policies:
Agricultural Trade and the Millennium WTO Round, edited by Spencer
Henson, 157-183. The Hague: Kluwer.
Hermitte,
Marie-Angèle et Christine Noiville. 2002. Marrakech et Carthagène comme
figures opposées du commerce international. In Le commerce international
des organismes génétiquement modifiés, sous la direction de Jacques Bourrinet
et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 317-351. Aix-Marseille/Paris: CERIC/La
Documentation française.
Herwig, Alexia. 2001. Legal and institutional aspects in the negotiation of
a Codex Alimentarius Convention. Zeitschrift für das gesamte
Lebensmittelrecht 2: 259-280.
Hill,
Ryan, Sam Johnston and Cyrie Sendashonga. 2005. Risk Assessment and
Precaution in the Biosafety Protocol. Review of European Community and
International Environmental Law (RECIEL). 13 (3): 263-269.
Hobbs, Ann L., Jill E. Hobbs and William A. Kerr. 2005. The
Biosafety Protocol: Multilateral Agreement or Protecting the
Environment or Protectionist Club? Journal of World Trade 39
(2): 281-300.
Holland Ian and Aynsley Kellow, 2001. Trade and
Risk Management: Exploring the Issues.
In Globalization and the Environment – Risk Assessment and the WTO,
edited by David Robertson and Aynsley Kellow, 229-249. Cheltenham, UK
and Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar Publ.
Hough, Peter. 2003. Poisons in the System: The Global Regulation of
Hazardous Pesticides. Global Environmental Politics 3 (2): 11-25.
Joensen, Lilian. 2003. Argentina, the GM Paradox. Third World Resurgence,
159/160. Nov./Dec., 36-40.
Koester, Veit. 2005. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: A New
Hot Spot in the Trade-Environment Conflict? In Trading in Genes -
Development Perspectives on Biotechnology, Trade and Sustainability,
edited by Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz and Vicente Sánchez, 171-199.
London: Earthscan.
Komindr, Athia. 2001. To Label or not to Label: Leveling the Playing Field.
In Reconciling Environment and Trade, edited by Edith Brown Weiss and
John H. Jackson, 673-689.
New York:
Transnational Publishers.
Kourilsky, Philippe et Geneviève Viney. 2000. Le Principe de Précaution -
Rapport au Premier Ministre. Paris: Odile Jacob, 405 p.
Krell, Karola. 2005. The EU Policy on
Genetically Modified Foods in the International Environment.
Zeitschrift für das gesamte Lebensmittelrecht ZLR 5,
563-474.
Lanfranchi, Marie-Pierre et Ève
Truilhé. 2002. La portée du principe de précaution.
In Le commerce international des organismes
génétiquement modifiés, edited by Jacques Bourrinet et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois,
71-97. Paris : CERIC et La
documentation française.
Leben, Charles et Joe Verhoeven. 2002, sous la direction de. Le principe
de précaution: Aspects de droit international et communautaire. Paris :
Editions Panthéon Assas, 248 p.
Lee,
Maria and Carolyn Abbot. 2003. Legislation - The Usual Suspects?
Public Participation Under the Aarhus Convention. The Modern
Law Review 66 (1): 80-108.
Leiss, William. 2001. In the Chamber of Risks — Understanding Risk
Controversies. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Le Prestre, Philippe G., ed. 2002.
Governing
Global Biodiversity: The Evolution and Implementation of the Convention on
Biological Diversity.
Aldershot, Hampshire:
Ashgate Publishing. 429 p.
Le
Prestre, Philippe G. 2002. Studying the Effectiveness of the CBD. In
Governing Global Biodiversity: The Evolution and Implementation of the
Convention on Biological Diversity, edited by Philippe G. Le Prestre,
57-91. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.
Mackenzie, Ruth. 2005. The Cartagena Protocol after the First Meeting of the
Parties. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law
(RECIEL). 13 (3): 270-278.
Mackenzie Ruth et
al. 2003. An Explanatory Guide to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.
IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 46. Gland/Geneva: IUCN,
Field, WRI. 294 p.
http://www.iucn.org/themes/law/pdfdocuments/Biosafety-guide.pdf
Mackenzie, Ruth and Philippe Sands. 2002. Prospects for international
environmental law. In The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling
Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development? Edited by
Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner and Helen Marquard, 457-467. London: RIIA/Earthscan.
Maljean-Dubois,
Sandrine. 2006. Relations entre normes techniques et normes
juridiques: illustrations à partir de l’exemple du commerce
international des produits biotechnologiques. In Les enjeux
de la normalisation technique internationale – Entre
environnement, santé et commerce international, sous la
direction d’ Estelle Brosset et Ève Truilhé-Marengo, 199-232.
Aix-en-Provence et Paris : CERIC et La documentation
française.
Maljean-Dubois, Sandrine. 2002.
La régulation du commerce international des OGM: Entre le droit
international de l’environnement et le droit de l’OMC. In Le commerce
international des organismes génétiquement modifiés, sous la direction
de Jacques Bourrinet et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 27-60.
Aix-Marseille/Paris:
CERIC/La Documentation française.
Maljean-Dubois, Sandrine. 2001. Le Protocole de Carthagène sur la
biosécurité et le commerce international des organismes génétiquement
modifiés. L'Observateur des Nations Unies 11, automne-hiver, 41-66.
Maljean-Dubois, Sandrine. 2000.
Biodiversité, biotechnologies, biosécurité: Le droit international
désarticulé.
Journal du droit international
127 (4): 949-996.
Marceau, Gabrielle. 2005. Le principe de précaution dans la jurisprudence
de l'OMC - Leçon inaugurale, Université de Genève, Faculté de droit.
EcoLomic Policy and Law 2 (3): 1-20.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Martinez Barrabes, Mireia. 2006. The Biosafety Protocol and Risk
Communication: Developments at the 3rd Meeting of the Parties (Curitiba
2006). EcoLomic Policy and Law 3 (3/4): 53-84
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Matthee, Mariëlle. 2002.
L’identification et l’étiquetage des OGM. In Le commerce international
des organismes génétiquement modifiés, sous la direction de Jacques Bourrinet
et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 177-212.
Aix-Marseille/Paris:
CERIC/La Documentation française.
Matthee, Mariëlle D. 2001. Regulating Scientific Expertise with Regard to
Risks Deriving from GMOs. In The EU and the International Legal Order:
Discord or Harmony? edited by V. Kronenberger, 199-221. The Hague: T.M.C.
Asser Press.
Mayet, Mariam. 2003.
Africa is the New Frontier for the GE Industry.
Third World Resurgence,
159/160. Nov./Dec., 33-36.
Mayr Juan and Adriana Soto. 2005. Balancing Biosafety and Trade:
The Negotiating History of the Cartagena Protocol. In Trading in Genes
- Development Perspectives on Biotechnology, Trade and
Sustainability, edited by Ricardo
Meléndez-Ortiz and Vicente Sánchez, 153-171. London:
Earthscan.
Mbengue, Makane
Moïse. 2004. Le Principe de précaution dans le commerce international – à
propos de l’évolution du Principe 15 de la déclaration de Rio.
EcoLomic
Policy and Law
1, 1-15.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Mbengue, Makane Moïse. 2004. Towards a Precautionary International Law:
About Uncertainty, Interdependence and Anticipation in Global Environmental
Governance. IHDP Update, February.
Mbengue, Makane Moïse. 2004.
Incertitude Scientifique, Précaution et Prévisibilité dans le Système
Commercial Multilatéral.
Passerelles,
janvier-mars, 4-5 & 17-18.
Mbengue, Makane Moïse. 2001. La
Convention de Stockholm sur les polluants organiques persistants.
L’Observateur des
Nations Unies,
11, automne-hiver, 67-87.
Mbengue, Makane Moïse
and Urs P. Thomas. 2006. Risk Communication, Informing the Public, and
Notification Procedures in MEAs. EcoLomic Policy and Law 3
(5): 84-101.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Makane Moïse Mbengue and Urs P. Thomas. 2005. The Precautionary Principle:
Torn between Biodiversity, Environment-related Food Safety and the WTO.
International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 5 (1/2) Special
Issue on the Precautionary Principle: 36-53.
Mbengue, Moïse Makane and Urs P. Thomas. 2004. The Precautionary
Principle’s Evolution in Light of the Four SPS Disputes. EcoLomic
Policy and Law
3, 1-15.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Mbengue, Moïse Makane and Urs P. Thomas. 2004. The Precautionary Principle:
Torn between Biodiversity, Environment-related Food Safety and the WTO.
International Journal for Global Environmental Issues,
forthcoming
McGivern, Brendan. 2004. No Change of Heart on the Precautionary Principle:
the Apple Dispute. Bridges 7 (4): 5-6.
McGraw, Désirée M. 2002. The Story of the Biodiversity Convention: From
Negotiation to Implementation. In Governing Global Biodiversity: The
Evolution and Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity,
edited by Philippe G. Le Prestre, 7-39. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate
Publishing.
Meijer Ernestine and Richard Steward. 2005. The GM Cold War: How Developing
Countries Can Go from Being Dominos to Being Players. Review of European
Community and International Environmental Law (RECIEL). 13 (3): 247-262.
Meléndez-Ortiz, Ricardo and Vicente Sánchez, editors. 2005.
Trading in Genes - Development Perspectives on Biotechnology, Trade
and Sustainability. London: Earthscan, 295 p.
Mooney,
Chris. 2005. The Republican War on Science. New York:
Basic Books, 343 p.
Morgan, David and Gavin Goh. 2005. Genetically Food Labelling and the WTO
Agreements. Review of European Community and International Environmental
Law (RECIEL). 13 (3): 306-319.
Morgera, Elisa.
2005. An Update on the Aarhus Convention and its Continued Global Relevance.
RECIEL 14 (29): 138-148.
Musselli, Irene and Simonetta Zarrilli. 2002. Non-Trade Concerns and the WTO
Jurisprudence in the Asbestos Case – Possible Relevance for
International Trade in GM Organisms. The Journal of World Intellectual
Property 5 (3): 373-394.
Newell, Peter. 2003. Globalization and the Governance of
Biotechnology. Global
Environmental Politics 3 (2): 56-72.
Noiville,
Christine. 2003. Du bon gouvernement des risques. Paris :
Presses universitaires de France – Les voies du droit, 235 p.
Noiville, Christine. 2000. Principe de précaution et Organisation mondiale
du Commerce: Le cas du commerce alimentaire. Journal du Droit
International 2: 263-299.
Noiville,
Christine et Nicolas de Sadeleer. 2001, La gestion des risques écologiques
et sanitaires à l'épreuve des chiffres - le droit entre enjeux scientifiques
et politiques. Revue du Droit de l'Union Européen 2: 389-450.
OECD. 1993.
Safety Evaluation of Foods Derived by Modern Biotechnology –
Concepts and Principles. Paris: OECD.
Ogolla, Bondi,
Markus A. Lehmann and Xueman Wang. 2003.
International Biodiversity and the World Trade Organization: Relationship
andPotential for Mutual Supportiveness. Environmental Policy and Law
33 (3-4): 117-133
Oliva, Maria Julia.
2006. Precaution as an autonomous right in the SPS Agreement:
Implications of the EC-Biotech findings regarding the nature
of Article 5.7. EcoLomic Policy and Law 3 (6):
101-117.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Oliva, Maria
Julia. 2004. Science and Precaution in the GMO Dispute: A Brief
Analysis of the First US Submission. Bridges Monthly 5:
8-10.
Paarlberg, Robert L. 1993. Managing Pesticide Use in Developing Countries.
In Institutions for the Earth, edited by Peter M. Haas, Robert O.
Keohane, and Marc A. Levy, 309-351. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2003. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law
- How WTO Law Relates to other Rules of International Law. Cambridge
University Press, 523 p.
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2001. Applying SPS in WTO Disputes. In Globalization and
the Environment – Risk Assessment and the WTO, edited by David Robertson
and Aynsley Kellow, 63-78. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass.:
Edward Elgar Publ.
Pauwelyn, Joost. 1999. The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS)
Measures as Applied in the First Three SPS Disputes. Journal of
International Economic Law 2 (4): 641-665.
Perret, Horace, Marc Audétat,
Barbara Bordogna Petriccione, Claude Joseph et Alain Kaufmann.
2004. Approaches of
Risk: An Introduction. Les cahiers du RIBios 2, 43 p.
Perrez, Franz Xaver. 2008. Risk
Regulation, Precaution and Trade. In Genetic Engineering and the World
Trade System -- World Trade Forum,
edited by Daniel Wüger
and Thomas Cottier, 246-286.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Perrez, Franz Xaver. 2000. The
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and the Relationship between the
Multilateral Trading System and MEAs. In "The Biosafety Protocol: Regulatory
Innovation and Emerging Trends," edited by Laurence Boisson de Chazournes
and Urs P. Thomas, Swiss Review of International and European Law 10
(4): 518-528.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/biosa_lbc_upt_etal_bp_regulatory_innov_emerging_trends_rsdie_00_4.pdf
Perrez, Franz Xaver. 2000. Taking Consensus Seriusly: The Swiss Regulatory
Approach to Genetically Modified Food. NYU Environmental Law Journal
8: 585-604.
http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/envtllaw/issues/vol8/3/v8n3a6.pdf
Petitpierre-Sauvain, Anne. 2008.
Coexistence and Liability: Implications for International Trade Drawn from
the Swiss Example. In Genetic Engineering and the World Trade System --
World Trade Forum 2005,
edited by Daniel Wüger
and Thomas Cottier, 175-193.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Petitpierre, Anne,
Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, Makane Moïse Mbengue and Urs P.
Thomas. 2006.
Introduction to
the Special Issue: WTO Law, Science and Risk Communication, edited
by Laurence Boisson de Chazournes and Urs P. Thomas. SNSF
Research Project 2nd Phase 2004-2006.
EcoLomic Policy
and Law
3
(1/2) 1-52.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Petitpierre, Anne, Laurence
Boisson de Chazournes, Franz Xaver Perrez, François Pythoud, Makane Moïse
Mbengue et Urs P. Thomas. 2004. Commerce, environnement et régulation
internationale des biotechnologies.
EcoLomic Policy and Law
1 (7), 47 p.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Petitpierre, Anne, Laurence Boisson de Chazournes,
Franz Xaver Perrez, François Pythoud, Makane Moïse Mbengue and Urs P.
Thomas. 2004. Trade, the Environment and the International Regulation of
Biotechnology.
EcoLomic Policy and Law
1 (8), 41
p.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Phillips, Peter W.B. and William A. Kerr. 2000. Alternative Paradigms: The
WTO versus the Biosafety Protocol for Trade in Genetically Modified
Organisms. Journal of World Trade 34 (4): 63-76.
Powell, D.
and W. Leiss. 1997. Mad Cows and Mother’s Milk: the Perils of
Poor Risk Communication. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University
Press, 321 p.
Prakash, Siddhartha. 2000. WTO Rules - Do they Conserve or Threaten
Biodiversity? Journal of World Intellectual Property 3 (1): 155-165.
Prévost, Denise. 2005. What Role for
the Precaustionary Principle in WTO Law after Japan-Apple?
EcoLomic Policy
and Law
2
(4), 14 p.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Procedural Manual of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, 12th edition. 2001.
Rome: FAO and WHO, 186 p. ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/manual/Manual12ce.pdf
Probart,
Claudia. 2002. Risk Communication in Food-Safety
Decision-Making. FAO, 10 p.
http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y4267M/y4267m03.htm
Pythoud, François. 2002. Commodities. In The Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and
Development? Edited by Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner and Helen Marquard,
321-329. London: RIIA/Earthscan.
Pythoud, François.
2002. Les procédures de décision dans le Protocole
de Cartagena sur la prévention des risques biotechnologiques. In Le
commerce international des organismes génétiquement modifiés, edited by
Jacques Bourrinet et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 61-71. Paris : CERIC et La
documentation française.
Pythoud, François. 2000. Le
Protocole de Cartagena sur la prévention des risques biologiques: Les enjeux
principaux des négociations.
In "The Biosafety
Protocol: Regulatory Innovation and Emerging Trends," edited by Laurence
Boisson de Chazournes and Urs P. Thomas, Swiss Review of International
and European Law 10 (4): 528-536.
Pythoud, François and Urs P. Thomas. 2002. The Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety. In Governing Global Biodiversity: The Evolution and
Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity, edited by
Philippe G. Le Prestre, 39-57. Aldershot, Hampshire UK: Ashgate.
Quick, Reinhard and Andreas Blüthner. 1999. Has the Appellate Body Erred? An
Appraisal and Criticism of the Ruling in the WTO Hormones Case.
Journal of International Economic Law 2 (4): 603-640.
Ricci, Ezra and Philippe Cullet. 2004. Biosafety Regulation: The Cartagena
Protocol. Les cahiers du RIBios 3, 60 p.
Rissler, Jane and Margaret Mellon. 1996. The Ecological Risks of
Engineered Crops. Cambridge, Mass. and London: MIT, 169 p.
Revéret, Jean-Pierre and Alain Webster. 2002. Economics and Biodiversity
Management. In Governing Global Biodiversity: The Evolution and
Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity, edited by
Philippe G. Le Prestre, 233-247. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate
Publishing.
Robertson, David and Aynsley Kellow, eds. 2001. Globalization and the
Environment -- Risk Assessment and the WTO. Cheltenham, UK and
Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar Publishers.
Rodenhoff, Vera. 2002. The Aarhus Convention
and its Implications for the 'Institutions' of the European Community.
RECIEL 11 (3): 343-357.
Romi, Raphaël.
2001. Codex Alimentarius:
De l'ambivalence à l'ambiguïté. Revue juridique de l'environnement
2: 201-214.
Romi, Raphael. 2000. Le Protocole sur la biosécurité: une étape vers l'écologisation
des échanges économiques internationaux, Les petites Affiches n°115,
9 juin.
Ruiz Fabri, Hélène. 2002.
Concurrence ou complémentarité entre les mécanismes de règlement des
différends du Protocole de Cartagena et ceux de l’OMC ? In Le commerce
international des organismes génétiquement modifiés, sous la direction
de Jacques Bourrinet et Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 149-176.
Aix-Marseille/Paris:
CERIC/La Documentation française.
Saam, Mirko, Barbara Bordogna
Petriccione et Andràs November.
2004. Rapport à La
Commission fédérale d'éthique pour le génie génétique dans le
domaine non humain (CENH) «Les impacts des plantes transgéniques
dans les pays en voie de développement et les pays en
transition». Les Cahiers du RIBios 5, 95 p.
http://www.ribios.ch/fr/documents/docs/Brochurespdf/Brochure5CENH_18.6.04.pdf
Sampson, Gary P. 2001. Risk and the WTO. In
Globalization and the Environment – Risk Assessment and the WTO,
edited by David Robertson and Aynsley Kellow, 15-26.
Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar Publ.
Scott, Dane. 2005. Perspectives on Precaution: the Role of Policymakers in
Dealing with the Uncertainties of Agricultural Biotechnology.
International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 5 (1/2) Special
Issue on the Precautionary Principle: 10-35.
Shaw, Sabrina, and Risa Schwartz. 2000. The Cartagena Protocol and the WTO:
Reflections on the Precautionary Principle. In "The Biosafety Protocol:
Regulatory Innovation and Emerging Trends," edited by Laurence Boisson de
Chazournes and Urs P. Thomas, Swiss Review of International and European
Law 10 (4): 536-543.
Sand, Peter
H. 2006. Labelling Genetically Modified Food: The Right to Know.
RECIEL 15 (2).
Stabinsky, Doreen. 2000. Bringing Social Analysis Into a Multilateral
Environmental Agreement: Social Impact Assessment and the Biosafety
Protocol. Journal of Environment and Development 9 (3): 260-284.
Stoll, Peter-Tobias. 2000. Controlling the Risks of Genetically Modified
Organisms: The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and the SPS Agreement. In
Yearbook of International Environmental Law, Volume 10 1999, edited by
Jutta Brunnée and Ellen Hey, 82-120. Oxford and New York: Oxford University
Press.
Tansey, Geoff. 2002. Food Security, Biotechnology and Intellectual Property.
A Discussion Paper. Geneva: Quaker UN Office, 30 p.
Tapper, Richard. 2002. The Making of the Protocol: actors’ perspectives –
Environment Business and Development Group. In The Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and
Development? Edited by Christoph Bail, Robert Falkner and Helen Marquard,
268-273. London: RIIA/Earthscan.
Third World Network.
2000.
Ten
articles on the Biosafety Protocol.
Third
World Resurgence. Special
Issue
Feb./Mar.
114/115:
* Biosafety talks
end on mixed note
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/note.htm
* Delayed, but
better, Biosafety Protocol
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/delay.htm
* The core issues in
the Biosafety Protocol: An analysis
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/core.htm
* The way forward
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/way.htm
* Biosafety
negotiations - flashbacks
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/flash.htm
* The
'Cartagena/Vienna setting':
Towards more transparent and democratic global negotiations
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/vienna.htm
* The CaMV promoter
story
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/story.htm
* The 'Golden Rice'
- a big illusion?
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/rice.htm
* Farmers say 'no'
to genetic engineering
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/farmer.htm
* Trouble in the
garden
http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/garden.htm
Thomas, Urs P. 2002. Phytosanitary and Phytogenetic Governance. Bridges
6 (6): 21-22.
Thomas, Urs P. 2000. Civil Society and its Role in the Negotiation of the
Biosafety Protocol. In "The Biosafety Protocol: Regulatory Innovation and
Emerging Trends," edited by Laurence Boisson de Chazournes and Urs P.
Thomas, Swiss Review of International and European Law 10 (4):
550-558.
Tiberghien,
Yves. 2006. The Battle for the Coherence of Genetically Modified
Organisms – The Role of the European Union, Japan, Korea, and
China in a Comparative Context. Les Études du CERIC 124,
50 p.
Toffler, Alvin. 1970. Future Shock. Random House.
Truilhé, Eve. 2003. Les règles
relatives à la preuve: quelle place pour l'incertitude
scientifique?
In
Droit
de l'Organisation Mondiale du Commerce et protection de
l'environnement,
sous la direction de Sandrine Maljean-Dubois, 443-461. Aix-en-Provence
et Bruxelles: CERIC et Bruylant.
Tsioumani, Elsa. 2004. Genetically
Modified Organisms in the EU: Public Attitudes and Regulatory
Developments. RECIEL 13 (3): 279-288.
Tuxill, John. 2000. The Biodiversity that People Made. World Watch 13
(3): 24-36.
Understanding the Codex Alimentarius. 1999. Rome: FAO and WHO, 35 p.
http://www.fao.org/docrep/w9114e/w9114e00.htm
Vig, Norman J.
and Michael G. Faure, editors. 2004. Green
Giants?
Environmental
Policies of the United States and the European Union.
Cambridge MA: MIT
Press. 381 p.
Wang, Xueman.
2003. Specific Trade
Obligations and the Biosafety Protocol. Bridges 7 (4): 16-19.
Wilson, David and Digby Gascoine, 2001.
National Risk Managemnt and the SPS Agreement.
In Globalization and the Environment – Risk Assessment and the WTO,
edited by David Robertson and Aynsley Kellow, 155-169. Cheltenham, UK
and Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar Publ.
Winickoff, David, Sheila
Jasanoff, Lawrence Busch, Robin Grove-White and Brian Wynne.
2005. Adjudicating the GM Food Wars: Science, Risk, and
Democracy in World Trade Law. Yale Journal of International
Law 30: 81-124.
http://csec.lancs.ac.uk/wtoamicus/Adjudicating_the_GM_Food_Wars.pdf
Wirth, David A. 1999. Some Reflections on Turtles, Tuna, Dolphin and Shrimp
[WTO and Science]. In Yearbook of International Environmental Law, Volume
9 1998, edited by Jutta Brunnée and Ellen Hey, 40-48. Oxford and New
York: Oxford University Press.
Wooldridge, Marion. 2001. Risk Assessment and
Risk Management in Policy Making.
In Globalization and the Environment – Risk Assessment and the WTO,
edited by David Robertson and Aynsley Kellow, 81-95. Cheltenham, UK
and Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar Publ.
WTO
Agreements Series. 1998. No. 4 Sanitary & Phytosanitary Measures.
Geneva: WTO, 50 p.
WTO.
1994/1999. The Legal Texts – The Results of the Uruguay Round of
Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Cambridge, UK: WTO/Cambridge University
Press, 493 p. The legal texts are available on
www.wto.org.
Wüger, Daniel.
2008. The Many Faces of Modern Biotechnology. In Genetic Engineering and
the World Trade System -- World Trade Forum, 3-16. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Wüger, Daniel. 2006. GMOs and WTO Law: The
Debate is Still Open. NCCR Trade Regulation Newsletter Vol. 1, No.2,
July.
http://www.nccr-trade.org/images/stories/news/NewsletterAugust2006.pdf
Wüger Daniel and
Thomas Cottier. 2008. Genetic Engineering and the World Trade System --
World Trade Forum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 357 p.
Yoke
Heong, Chee. 2003. The Economics of Biotech. Third World Resurgence,
159/160. Nov./Dec., 26-30.
Yoke
Heong, Chee. 2003. GM Crops in Africa are Poverty-Insensitive. Third
World Resurgence, 159/160. Nov./Dec., 30-33.
Young,
Tomme. 2006. Biotechnology Commentary: Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety MOP-3. Bridges Trade BioRes 6 (6),
12 p. http://www.ictsd.org/biores/06-04-03/story2.htm
Yu
III, Vincente Paolo B. 2001. Compatibility of GMO Import Regulations with
WTO Rules. In Reconciling Environment and Trade, edited by Edith
Brown Weiss and John H. Jackson, 575-673. New York: Transnational
Publishers.
Zarrilli, Simonetta. 2008.
Biotechnology in the Energy Sector: some Implications for Developing
Countries. In Genetic Engineering and the World Trade System -- World
Trade Forum 2005,
edited by Daniel Wüger and Thomas Cottier,
151-175.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Zarrilli, Simonetta. 2005. International Trade in GMOs and GM Products:
National and Multilateral Legal Frameworks. Policy Issues in International
Trade and Commodities, Study Series No. 29, Geneva: UNCTAD, 52 p.
Zarrilli, Simonetta. 2000. International Trade in Genetically Modified
Organisms: Developing Country Concerns and Possible Options. In "The
Biosafety Protocol: Regulatory Innovation and Emerging Trends," edited by
Laurence Boisson de Chazournes and Urs P. Thomas, Swiss Review of
International and European Law 10
(4): 543-550.
Zedalis, R.J. 2001. Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods: The Limits of
GATT Rules. Journal of World Trade 35 (2): 301-347.
Zerhdoud, Badr. 2005. Le Régime
juridique international des biotechnologies: entre libre-échange et
protection de l'environnement.
EcoLomic
Policy and Law 2 (5/6),
64 p.
http://www.ecolomics-international.org/ecolomic_policy_and_law.htm
Zarrilli, Simonetta.
2008. Biotechnology in the Energy Sector: some Implications for
Developing Countries. In
